EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-230/23, Reprobel: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 November 2024 (request for a preliminary ruling from the ondernemingsrechtbank Gent, afdeling Gent – Belgium) – Reprobel CV v Copaco Belgium NV (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Approximation of laws – Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society – Directive 2001/29/EC – Article 2 – Reproduction right – Article 5(2)(a) and (b) – Exceptions and limitations – Fair compensation – Direct effect – Entity entrusted by the State with collecting and distributing fair compensation – Special powers)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0230

62023CA0230

November 14, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/132

13.1.2025

(Case C-230/23, (1) Reprobel)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 2 - Reproduction right - Article 5(2)(a) and (b) - Exceptions and limitations - Fair compensation - Direct effect - Entity entrusted by the State with collecting and distributing fair compensation - Special powers)

(C/2025/132)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Reprobel CV

Defendant: Copaco Belgium NV

Operative part of the judgment

1.Article 5(2)(a) and (b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society must be interpreted as meaning that an individual may rely, before a national court, against an entity entrusted by a Member State with collecting and distributing the fair compensation established under that provision, on the fact that the national legislation laying down that compensation contravenes provisions of EU law which have direct effect, provided that such an entity has, in order to perform that task in the public interest, special powers beyond those which result from the normal rules applicable in relations between individuals.

2.Article 5(2)(a) and (b) of Directive 2001/29 must be interpreted as having direct effect, and that therefore, in the absence of a correct transposition of that provision, an individual may rely on it for the purposes of disapplying national rules under which that individual is obliged to pay remuneration by way of fair compensation imposed in contravention of that provision.

(1) OJ C 252, 17.7.2023.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/132/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia