- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-53/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 February 2014 — Diamantopoulos v EEAS (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 — Implied decision rejecting the complaint — Express decision rejecting the complaint subsequent to the action — Statement of reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FA0053
62013FA0053
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.4.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 102/44
(Case F-53/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 - Implied decision rejecting the complaint - Express decision rejecting the complaint subsequent to the action - Statement of reasons))
2014/C 102/64
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Alkis Diamantopoulos (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and E. Chaboureau, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 12 in the 2012 promotion year.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Annuls the decision of the European External Action Service not to promote Mr Diamantopoulos to grade AD 12 in the 2012 promotion exercise;
2.Declares that the European External Action Service is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay the costs incurred by Mr Diamantopoulos.
(<span class="note">1</span>) OJ C 215, 27.7.2013, p. 20.
* * *
Language of the case: French