I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark doqo - Earlier EU figurative mark Do Do - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2025/3287)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: DoDo Services s. r. o. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: J. Matzner, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: doqo (Paris, France) (represented by: D. Huart, lawyer)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 15 April 2024 (Case R 1921/2023-2).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders DoDo Services s. r. o., in addition to bearing its own costs, to pay those incurred by doqo;
3.Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) is to bear its own costs.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/4486, 22.7.2024.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3287/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—