- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-650/18: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 3 June 2021 — Hungary v European Parliament (Action for annulment — Article 7(1) TEU — European Parliament resolution on a proposal calling on the Council of the European Union to determine the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach of the values on which the European Union is founded — Articles 263 and 269 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the Court — Admissibility of the appeal — Challengeable act — Article 354 TFEU — Rules for counting votes in the Parliament — Rules of Procedure of the Parliament — Rule 178(3) — Concept of ‘votes cast’ — Abstentions — Principles of legal certainty, equal treatment, democracy and sincere cooperation)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0650
62018CA0650
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.7.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 289/3
(Case C-650/18) (*)
(Action for annulment - Article 7(1) TEU - European Parliament resolution on a proposal calling on the Council of the European Union to determine the existence of a clear risk of a serious breach of the values on which the European Union is founded - Articles 263 and 269 TFEU - Jurisdiction of the Court - Admissibility of the appeal - Challengeable act - Article 354 TFEU - Rules for counting votes in the Parliament - Rules of Procedure of the Parliament - Rule 178(3) - Concept of ‘votes cast’ - Abstentions - Principles of legal certainty, equal treatment, democracy and sincere cooperation)
(2021/C 289/03)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Parties
Applicant: Hungary (represented: initially by M.Z. Fehér, G. Tornyai and Zs. Wagner, and subsequently by M.Z. Fehér, acting as Agents)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: F. Drexler, N. Görlitz and T. Lukácsi, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Hungary to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Parliament;
3.Orders the Republic of Poland to bear its own costs.
(*) Language of the case: Hungarian.
(1) OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.