- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-56/22: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 8 September 2022 (request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — PL v État belge (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling — Lack of sufficient information — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CB0056
62022CB0056
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.1.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 15/20
(Case C-56/22) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Requirement to set out the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling - Lack of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2023/C 15/21)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: PL
Defendant: État belge
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance de Liège (Court of First Instance, Liège, Belgium), made by decision of 14 January 2022, is manifestly inadmissible.
(*)
Language of the case: French
* * *
(2023/C 15/21)
ECLI:EU:C:2023:140