EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Rectification order of 12 July 2021.#Amoena Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Rectification of judgment.#Case C-677/18.

ECLI:EU:C:2021:587

62018CO0677

July 12, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

ORDER OF THE COURT (Tenth Chamber)

12 July 2021 (*1)

(Rectification of judgment)

In Case C‑677/18 REC,

REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom), made by decision of 1 November 2018, received at the Court on 5 November 2018, in the proceedings

Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs,

THE COURT (Tenth Chamber),

composed of E. Juhász, acting as President of the Chamber, C. Lycourgos (Rapporteur) and I. Jarukaitis, Judges,

Advocate General: M. Bobek,

Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,

after hearing the Advocate General,

makes the following

1On 19 December 2019, the Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered the judgment in Amoena (C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142).

2That judgment contains, in the version in the language of the case, an error which it is appropriate for the Court to rectify of its own motion in accordance with Article 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure.

On those grounds, the Court (Tenth Chamber) hereby orders:

1.Paragraph 51 of the judgment of 19 December 2019, Amoena (C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142), in the version in the language of the case, shall be rectified as follows:

‘It follows from the Court’s case-law that the notion of “accessories”, for the purposes of Chapter 90 of the CN, implies interchangeable parts or devices designed to adapt a machine for a particular operation, or to increase its range of operations, or to enable it to perform a particular service relative to its main function (see, to that effect, judgments of 16 June 2011, Unomedical, C‑152/10, EU:C:2011:402, paragraph 29, and of 4 March 2015, Oliver Medical, C‑547/13, EU:C:2015:139, paragraph 69).’

2.The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment.

Luxembourg, 12 July 2021.

Registrar

Acting as President of the Tenth Chamber

ECLI:EU:C:2021:140

*1 Language of the case: English.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia