EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-19/05: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Boliden and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Copper plumbing tube industry — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Continuous and multiform infringement — Fines — Limitation period — Cooperation)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62005TA0019

62005TA0019

May 19, 2010
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

3.7.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 179/30

(Case T-19/05) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Copper plumbing tube industry - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Continuous and multiform infringement - Fines - Limitation period - Cooperation)

(2010/C 179/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Boliden AB (Stockholm, Sweden); Outokumpu Copper Fabrication AB, formerly Boliden Fabrication AB (Västerås, Sweden); Outokumpu Copper BCZ SA, formerly Boliden Cuivre & Zinc SA (Liège, Belgium) (represented: initially by C. Wetter and O. Rislund and subsequently by C. Wetter and M. Johansson, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier and S. Noë, Agents)

Re:

Application (i) for annulment of Article 1(a) to (c) of Commission Decision C(2004) 2826 of 3 September 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/E-1/38.069 — Copper plumbing tubes) in so far as it was thereby found that the applicants participated in an infringement between 1 July 1995 and 27 August 1998 and between 10 December 1998 and 7 October 1999; (ii) for reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants by that decision; and (iii) by way of counterclaim by the Commission, for the amount of that fine to be increased.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Dismisses the European Commission’s counterclaim;

3.Orders Boliden AB, Outokumpu Copper Fabrication AB and Outokumpu Copper BCZ SA to bear their own costs and to pay 90 % of the costs incurred by the Commission;

4.Orders the Commission to bear 10 % of its own costs.

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia