- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-471/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2011 — Oetker Nahrungsmittel v OHIM — Bonfait (Buonfatti) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ‘Buonfatti’ — Earlier Benelux word mark Bonfait — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2007/2009)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TA0471
62009TA0471
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
6.8.2011
Official Journal of the European Union
C 232/24
(Case T-471/09) (*)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ‘Buonfatti’ - Earlier Benelux word mark Bonfait - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 2007/2009)
(2011/C 232/41)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Dr. Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: F. Graf von Stosch, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Manea, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bonfait BV (Denekamp, Netherlands)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 October 2009 (Case R 340/2007-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Bonfait BV and Dr. August Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 2 October 2009 (Case R 340/2007-4).
2.Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Dr. Oetker Nahrungsmittel KG.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2011:232