- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-25/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Haw Par v OHIM — Cosmowell (GelenkGold)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0025
62016TN0025
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.3.2016
Official Journal of the European Union
C 106/39
(Case T-25/16)
(2016/C 106/45)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Haw Par Corp. Ltd (Singapore, Singapore) (represented by: R. Härer, C. Schultze, J. Ossing, C. Weber, H. Ranzinger, C. Gehweiler, C. Brockmann, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cosmowell GmbH (Sankt Johann in Tirol, Austria)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘GelenkGold’ — Community trade mark No 9 957 978
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2015 in Case R 1907/2015-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs that the applicant incurred before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Infringement of the second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.