I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Annex IX - Article 3 - Compliance with the judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal and of the General Court of the European Union - Annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority - Discretion - Obligation to resume the proceedings at the very point at which the illegality occurred - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Article 29 - Compensation for the harm suffered)
(C/2025/682)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: DD (represented by: N. Lorenz, Rechtsanwältin)
Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented initially by M. O’Flaherty, and subsequently by S. Rautio, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021, DD v FRA (T-632/19, EU:T:2021:434);
2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Reserves the costs.
—
(1)
OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/682/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: English