EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-587/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 December 2024 – DD v European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (Appeal – Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Disciplinary proceedings – Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union – Annex IX – Article 3 – Compliance with the judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal and of the General Court of the European Union – Annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority – Discretion – Obligation to resume the proceedings at the very point at which the illegality occurred – Rights of the defence – Right to be heard – Article 29 – Compensation for the harm suffered)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0587

62021CA0587

December 12, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/682

10.2.2025

(Case C-587/21 P)

(Appeal - Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Disciplinary proceedings - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Annex IX - Article 3 - Compliance with the judgments of the Civil Service Tribunal and of the General Court of the European Union - Annulment of the decisions of the appointing authority - Discretion - Obligation to resume the proceedings at the very point at which the illegality occurred - Rights of the defence - Right to be heard - Article 29 - Compensation for the harm suffered)

(C/2025/682)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: DD (represented by: N. Lorenz, Rechtsanwältin)

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) (represented initially by M. O’Flaherty, and subsequently by S. Rautio, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021, DD v FRA (T-632/19, EU:T:2021:434);

2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

3.Reserves the costs.

(1)

OJ C 37, 24.1.2022.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/682/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

* * *

Language of the case: English

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia