I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2020/C 262/44)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Wirtschaftsgesellschaft des Kfz-Gewerbes mbH (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: N. Hebeis, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Blink Fish Srl (Milan, Italy)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of a fish) — European Union trade mark No 17 301 359
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 April 2020 in Case R 2333/2019-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—partially annul the contested decision as far as the following services of the contested European Union trade mark application No 17 301 359 are concerned:
—class 35: Advertising, Business management;
—class 38: Telecommunication services;
—class 41: Entertainment services, Sporting and cultural activities, Teaching, Training;
—order EUIPO to bear the costs of the proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the failure to state reasons in the contested decision of the Board of Appeal.