- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-101/22 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 May 2023 — European Commission v Sopra Steria Benelux, Unisys Belgium (Appeal — Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Article 169 — Appeal against the operative part of the decision of the General Court — Public service contracts — Tendering procedure — Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 — Article 170(3) — Paragraph 23 of Annex I — Unsuccessful tenderer bringing to the European Commission’s attention evidence of the abnormally low nature of the successful tender — Scope of the contracting authority’s obligation to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CA0101
62022CA0101
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.6.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 223/4
(Case C-101/22 P)
(Appeal - Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Article 169 - Appeal against the operative part of the decision of the General Court - Public service contracts - Tendering procedure - Regulation (EU, Euratom) 2018/1046 - Article 170(3) - Paragraph 23 of Annex I - Unsuccessful tenderer bringing to the European Commission’s attention evidence of the abnormally low nature of the successful tender - Scope of the contracting authority’s obligation to state reasons)
(2023/C 223/04)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: L. André, M. Ilkova and O. Verheecke, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Sopra Steria Benelux, Unisys Belgium (represented by: L. Masson and G. Tilman, avocats)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 207, 23.5.2022.