- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-591/19: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — Healios v EUIPO — Helios Kliniken (Healios) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark Healios — Earlier EU word mark HELIOS — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article (8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0591
62019TA0591
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.11.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 462/36
(Case T-591/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Healios - Earlier EU word mark HELIOS - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))
(2021/C 462/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Healios KK (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: P. Venohr, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Helios Kliniken GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: B. Michaelis, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 June 2019 (Case R 341/2018-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Helios Kliniken and Healios.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 June 2019 (Case R 341/2018-5) in so far as it concerns the goods and services in Classes 1, 5 and 44 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and corresponding to the following description for each of those classes:
—Class 1: ‘Stem cells for scientific purposes’, ‘Stem cells for research purposes’;
—Class 5: ‘Veterinary preparations’, ‘Stem cells for medical purposes; Cellular function activating agents for medical purposes; Stem cells for veterinary purposes’, ‘Surgical implants grown from stem cells’;
—Class 44: ‘Medical services relating to the removal, treatment and processing of stem cells; Medical services relating to the removal, treatment and processing of human blood, umbilical cord blood, human cells, stem cells and bone marrow’;
2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
3.Orders each party to bear its own costs.
(*)
OJ C 363, 28.10.2019.
* Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140
15