EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 July 2006.#Teemu Hakala v Oy L. Simons Transport Ab.#Reference for a preliminary ruling: Korsholms tingsrätt - Finland.#Second subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Question the answer to which admits of no reasonable doubt - Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 - Harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport - Payments to wage-earning drivers related to distances covered - Prohibition of such a pay scheme unless it does not endanger road safety.#Case C-93/05.

ECLI:EU:C:2006:470

62005CO0093

July 13, 2006
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case C-93/05)

Second subparagraph of Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure – Question the answer to which admits of no reasonable doubt – Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 – Harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport – Payments to wage-earning drivers related to distances covered – Prohibition of such a pay regime unless it does not endanger road safety

Transport – Road transport – Social provisions (Council Regulation No 3820/85, Art. 10) (see paras 24-28, 30)

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Korsholms tingsrätt – Interpretation of Article 10 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport (OJ 1985 L 370, p. 1) – Payments to a wage-earning driver based on distances covered

Operative part:

A pay scheme based on distances covered is contrary to Article 10 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport, unless such a scheme is of such a kind as not to endanger road safety. It is for the national court to ascertain, in view of all the circumstances of the case in the main proceedings, whether that is the case.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia