I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2019/C 122/29)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Pontinova AG (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: K. Loth, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ponti & Partners, SLP (Barcelona, Spain)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark pontinova — Application for registration No 15 878 085
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2018 in Case R 566/2018-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—award the costs in favour of the applicant.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.