- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-275/20: Action brought on 23 June 2020 — European Commission v Council of the European Union
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CN0275
62020CN0275
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
24.8.2020
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 279/39
(Case C-275/20)
(2020/C 279/52)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. Afonso, D. Schaffrin, Agents)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul Council Decision (EU) 2020/470 (1) of 25 March 2020 as regards the extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part;
—order Council to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The action for annulment brought by the Commission concerns the renewal for 3 years of an entitlement of audiovisual co-productions of producers from the EU Party and Korea to benefit from the respective schemes for the promotion of local/regional cultural content under Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, and the Republic of Korea.
The Commission relies, in support of its action, on one single ground.
The Commission considers that by basing its decision on Article 3(1) of Council Decision (EU) 2015/2169 (2) of 1 October 2015 on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, and not on Article 218(6) TFEU as proposed by the Commission, the Council relied on a secondary legal basis, not provided for in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). Therefore, the Council violated the principle of conferral of powers in Article 13(2) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the principle of institutional balance as developed in the case-law of the Court of Justice.
(1) Council Decision (EU) 2020/470 of 25 March 2020 as regards the extension of the period of entitlement for audiovisual co-productions as provided for in Article 5 of the Protocol on Cultural Cooperation to the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, OJ 2020, L 101, p. 1.
(2) Council Decision (EU) 2015/2169 of 1 October 2015 on the conclusion of the Free Trade Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of Korea, of the other part, OJ 2015, L 307, p. 2.