- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-317/18: Order of the General Court of 17 June 2019 — Fugro v Commission (Action for annulment — Galileo satellite navigation programme — Technical and operational specifications — Lack of individual concern — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018TB0317
62018TB0317
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 295/37
(Case T-317/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Action for annulment - Galileo satellite navigation programme - Technical and operational specifications - Lack of individual concern - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2019/C 295/48)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Fugro NV (Leidschendam, Netherlands) (represented by: initially, T. Snoep and V. van Weperen and, subsequently, V. van Weperen, H. Gornall and J. de Pree, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, L. Armati and B. Sasinowska, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2018/321 of 2 March 2018 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/224 setting out the technical and operational specifications allowing the commercial service offered by the system established under the Galileo programme to fulfil the function referred to in Article 2(4)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 1285/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2018 L 62, p. 34), and, in the alternative, for annulment of Article 1(2) of that decision.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
2.Fugro NV is ordered to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 240, 9.7.2018.