EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-327/24: Action brought on 28 June 2024 – Techtex v EUIPO – Alberts (Dr.Albert)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0327

62024TN0327

June 28, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/4871

12.8.2024

(Case T-327/24)

(C/2024/4871)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Techtex SRL (Oșorhei, Romania) (represented by: B. Bularda, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Adina Alberts (Bucharest, Romania)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Dr.Albert – European Union trade mark No 18 221 810

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2024 in Case R 763/2023-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the contested decision;

primarily, reject the cancellation in its entirety;

in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal for reconsideration;

order EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own cost and pay the costs incurred by the applicant before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

Plea in law

Failure to take account of the bad faith of the cancellation applicant and the evidence regarding the bad faith of the cancellation applicant;

Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the relevant case-law.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4871/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia