I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
12.8.2024
(C/2024/4871)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Techtex SRL (Oșorhei, Romania) (represented by: B. Bularda, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Adina Alberts (Bucharest, Romania)
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark Dr.Albert – European Union trade mark No 18 221 810
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 April 2024 in Case R 763/2023-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—primarily, reject the cancellation in its entirety;
—in the alternative, refer the case back to the Board of Appeal for reconsideration;
—order EUIPO and the intervener to bear their own cost and pay the costs incurred by the applicant before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.
—Failure to take account of the bad faith of the cancellation applicant and the evidence regarding the bad faith of the cancellation applicant;
—Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and the relevant case-law.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4871/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—