EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-352/25, EOS Matrix: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 26 May 2025 – EOS Matrix EOOD v V.P.M.

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0352

62025CN0352

May 26, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/4577

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sofiyski rayonen sad (Bulgaria) lodged on 26 May 2025 – ‘EOS Matrix’ EOOD v V.P.M.

(Case C-352/25, EOS Matrix)

(C/2025/4577)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:

‘EOS Matrix’ EOOD

Defendant: V.P.M.

Questions referred

Must the concept of ‘contractual term’ in Article 3(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>) on unfair terms in consumer contracts, having regard also to the requirements for judicial assessment under Article 4(1) of that Directive, be interpreted as denoting an agreement between consumer and trader that must necessarily be contained in a separate sentence or text element (point, letter, paragraph) of the written contract concluded between them, or must that concept be interpreted as an agreement that reflects the common intention [of the parties], irrespective of its format, even if this results from the interpretation of different text elements of the written contract; and what criteria are used to make that distinction?

Must Article 6(1) of Directive 93/13/EEC on unfair terms in consumer contracts be interpreted as precluding national case-law which, where a consumer credit contract contains a term providing for a variable interest rate that comprises the sum of a fixed component and a variable component, without objective criteria for calculating the variable component being set out, and that term is therefore declared unfair, allows that agreement to be applied to a consumer who has not made any express declaration before the court concerning the effect of that term, the interest rate applicable to the credit contract at the time the loan was granted, comprising the sum of the two components, being maintained as the fixed interest rate, if the latter is clearly quantified in the agreement?

(1) Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/4577/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia