- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case F-59/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014 — Rouffaud v EEAS (Civil Service — Auxiliary member of contract staff — Reclassification of the contract — Pre-litigation procedure — Rule that the complaint must be consistent with the action — Amendment of the grounds of challenge in the case)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013FA0059
62013FA0059
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.5.2014
Official Journal of the European Union
C 159/39
(Case F-59/13)( (<span class="super">1</span>))
((Civil Service - Auxiliary member of contract staff - Reclassification of the contract - Pre-litigation procedure - Rule that the complaint must be consistent with the action - Amendment of the grounds of challenge in the case))
2014/C 159/53
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Thierry Rouffaud (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented initially by: A. Coolen, É. Marchal, S. Orlandi and D. Abreu Caldas, and subsequently by: S. Orlandi and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)
Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s application to have his successive fixed-term employment contracts reclassified as a contract of indefinite duration and to have his period completed as an auxiliary member of the contract staff recognised as a period of service completed as a member of the contract staff.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Rouffard to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European External Action Service.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 233, 10.8.2013, p. 14.
Language of the case: French