EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-125/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2013 — Mendes v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Non-admission to the assessment tests — Administration’s duty to interpret complaints in a spirit of openness — Amendment to the vacancy notice after holding the admission tests — Principle of legitimate expectations — Legal certainty)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011FA0125

62011FA0125

March 13, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

27.4.2013

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/28

(Case F-125/11) (<span class="super">1</span>)

(Civil service - Open competition - Non-admission to the assessment tests - Administration’s duty to interpret complaints in a spirit of openness - Amendment to the vacancy notice after holding the admission tests - Principle of legitimate expectations - Legal certainty)

2013/C 123/49

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Isabel Mendes (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rogrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application to annul the decision not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests in competition EPSO/AST/111/10

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

1.annuls the decision of the selection board of open competition EPSO/AST/111/10 of 7 April 2011 not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests;

2.orders the European Commission to pay EUR 2 000 to the applicant;

3.dismisses the application as to the remainder;

4.orders each party to bear its own costs.

(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 21.

* * *

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia