I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-624/11 P)
2012/C 133/27
Language of the case: French
Appellant: Brighton Collectibles, Inc. (represented by: J. Horn, avocat)
Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Felmar
—Set aside the judgment of the General Court in Case T-403/10;
—Order OHIM to bear its own costs and those of the appellant;
—Order Felmar to bear its own costs if it intervenes in the proceedings.
By the present appeal, the appellant claims that the General Court failed to make a valid assessment of the evidence the appellant submitted to it and failed to give sufficient reasons for its decision with regard to the national laws relied upon, in particular, Irish and UK case-law relating to passing off. Consequently, the General Court infringed the provisions of Article 8(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark. (<span class="italic">1</span>)
* Language of the case: French.
OJ 2009 L 78, p. 1.