- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-282/21: Order of the General Court of 7 April 2022 — SS and ST v Frontex (Actions for failure to act — Right to asylum — Invitation to act — Position taken by Frontex — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0282
62021TB0282
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
11.7.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 266/26
(Case T-282/21)
(Actions for failure to act - Right to asylum - Invitation to act - Position taken by Frontex - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 266/31)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: SS, ST (represented by: M. Van den Broeck and L. Lambert, lawyers)
Defendant: European Border and Coast Guard Agency (represented by: H. Caniard, S. Drew and W. Szmidt, acting as Agents, and by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
Re:
Application under Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that Frontex unlawfully failed to adopt, under Article 46(4) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624 (OJ 2019 L 295, p. 1), a decision suspending or terminating its activities in the Aegean Sea region.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.SS, ST and the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) shall bear their own costs.
(1) OJ C 289, 19.7.2021.