I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(2021/C 289/63)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: Classen Holz Kontor GmbH (Kaisersesch, Germany) (represented by: M. Bergermann and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Deutsche Steinzeug Cremer & Breuer AG (Alfter, Germany)
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘DRYTILE’ — Application for registration No 17 999 950
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 March 2021 in Case R 1226/2020-4
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the appeal proceedings.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.