- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-640/20 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 March 2023 — PV v European Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Psychological harassment — Medical opinions — Unjustified absences — Remuneration — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 11a — Conflict of interests — Article 21a — Manifestly illegal order — Article 23 — Compliance with laws and police regulations — Disciplinary procedure — Removal from post — Withdrawal of removal — New disciplinary procedure — Fresh removal from post)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020CA0640
62020CA0640
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.5.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 173/2
(Case C-640/20 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Psychological harassment - Medical opinions - Unjustified absences - Remuneration - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 11a - Conflict of interests - Article 21a - Manifestly illegal order - Article 23 - Compliance with laws and police regulations - Disciplinary procedure - Removal from post - Withdrawal of removal - New disciplinary procedure - Fresh removal from post)
(2023/C 173/02)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: PV (represented by: D. Birkenmaier, Rechtsanwalt)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by: T.S. Bohr, B. Mongin and A.-C. Simon, and subsequently by T.S. Bohr and A.-C. Simon, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders PV to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 98, 22.3.2021.