I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
C series
—
3.2.2025
(C/2025/576)
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Capgemini España, SL (Madrid, Spain), UniSystems Luxembourg Sàrl (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: T. Dal Farra and E. Caupert, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—annul the decision awarding Framework Agreement No EUIPO/2024/OP/0007 to the three successful tenderers, set out in EUIPO’s letter dated 6 November 2024;
—annul the decision implicitly rejecting the complaint made by the companies Capgemini España SL and UniSystems Luxembourg Sàrl, characterised by EUIPO’s failure to respond in the three days following receipt of their letter of complaint dated 16 November 2024;
—annul the decision to sign Framework Agreement No EUIPO/2024/OP/0007;
—in the event that Framework Agreement No EUIPO/2024/OP/0007 has already been signed, annul that contract;
—order EUIPO to pay all of the costs.
In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging distortion of the tender submitted by the applicants. The applicants argue that that modification constitutes a breach of the principle of equal treatment.
2.Second plea in law, alleging error of assessment on the part of EUIPO in the analysis of the various tenders.
3.Third plea in law, alleging irregularity in the successive extensions of the deadline for the submission of tenders.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/576/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—