EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-595/24: Action brought on 22 November 2024 – Capgemini España and UniSystems Luxembourg v EUIPO

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0595

62024TN0595

November 22, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/576

3.2.2025

(Case T-595/24)

(C/2025/576)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Capgemini España, SL (Madrid, Spain), UniSystems Luxembourg Sàrl (Bertrange, Luxembourg) (represented by: T. Dal Farra and E. Caupert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

annul the decision awarding Framework Agreement No EUIPO/2024/OP/0007 to the three successful tenderers, set out in EUIPO’s letter dated 6 November 2024;

annul the decision implicitly rejecting the complaint made by the companies Capgemini España SL and UniSystems Luxembourg Sàrl, characterised by EUIPO’s failure to respond in the three days following receipt of their letter of complaint dated 16 November 2024;

annul the decision to sign Framework Agreement No EUIPO/2024/OP/0007;

in the event that Framework Agreement No EUIPO/2024/OP/0007 has already been signed, annul that contract;

order EUIPO to pay all of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging distortion of the tender submitted by the applicants. The applicants argue that that modification constitutes a breach of the principle of equal treatment.

2.Second plea in law, alleging error of assessment on the part of EUIPO in the analysis of the various tenders.

3.Third plea in law, alleging irregularity in the successive extensions of the deadline for the submission of tenders.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/576/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia