I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
2012/C 243/36
Language of the case: French
Applicants: Technion — Israel Institute of Technology (Haïfa, Israel) and Technion Research & Development Foundation Ltd (Haïfa) (represented by: D. Grisay, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
The applicants claim that the Court should:
—admit this action for annulment based on Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
—declare it to be admissible, and
—primarily, declare the action well-founded and annul the decision for compensation of the Commission, Directorate General of Information Society and Media, contained in its letter of 13 March 2012, directed against TECHNION;
—order the European Commission to pay the costs.
In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those put forward in Case T-657/11 Technion and Technion Research & Development Foundation v Commission. (1)
(1) OJ 2012 C 73, p. 28.