I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community figurative mark COLORIS – Earlier national word mark COLORIS – Relative ground for refusal – Genuine use of the earlier trade mark – Article 15(2)(a) and Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 15(1)(a) and Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Community trade mark – Observations of third parties and opposition – Examination of the opposition – Proof of use of the earlier mark – Use in a form without differences capable of affecting the distinctive character of the trade mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Arts 15(2)(a) and 43(2) and (3)) (see paras 36, 50)
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 June 2007 (Case R 1060/2006‑1), concerning opposition proceedings between Coloris Global Coloring Concept and Esber, SA.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Figurative mark containing the word COLORIS for goods in Class 2 – Application No 2817732
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Coloris Global Coloring Concept
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
French national word mark COLORIS for goods in Class 2 (No 98/717642)
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Esber, SA to pay the costs.