EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 March 2011. # Robert Nicolaus Abt and Others v Hypo Real Estate Holding AG. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Landgericht München I - Germany. # Reference for a preliminary ruling - Relevance of the question - No jurisdiction. # Case C-194/10.

ECLI:EU:C:2011:182

62010CO0194

March 24, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case C-194/10)

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Relevance of the question – No jurisdiction

Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Jurisdiction of the Court – Limits – Question clearly irrelevant (Art. 267 TFEU) (see paras 36-39)

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Landgericht München I – Interpretation of Article 297 EC and of Article 5(1) of Directive 2007/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (OJ 2007 L 184, p. 17) – Period for convocation of general meeting of a listed company – National legislation, ceasing to have effect on the expiry of the transposition period for the directive, which provides for a shorter convocation period than the minimum period under the directive – Provision likely seriously to compromise the result prescribed by the directive, in the light of the national legislation according to which some decisions of the general meeting remain valid after being registered in the commercial register, even in the event of annulment following legal action.

Operative part

The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the first question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Landgericht München I.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia