I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the Community word mark CARPOVIRUSINE – Former national word mark CARPO – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word marks CARPOVIRUSINE and CARPO (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 71-72)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 March 2004 (Case R 289/2003-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Calliope SAS and BASF AG.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark ‘CARPOVIRUSINE’ – Application No 1422641, for goods in Class 5 (insecticides, etc.)
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
BASF AG
Mark or sign sited in opposition:
National and international word mark ‘CARPO’ for goods in Class 5
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Refusal to register
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Dismissal of the action
The Court:
Dismisses the action;
Orders the applicant to pay the costs.