- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-134/08: Action brought on 4 April 2008 — Schräder v CPVO — Jørn Hansson (Lemon Symphony)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TN0134
62008TN0134
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.6.2008
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 142/32
(Case T-134/08)
(2008/C 142/58)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Ralf Schräder (Lüdinghausen, Germany) (represented by: T. Leidereiter and W.-A. Schmidt, lawyers)
Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of CPVO: Jørn Hansson (Søndersø, Denmark)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of CPVO of 4 December 2007 (Case A 006/2007);
—Order the defendant to pay the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community plant variety right concerned: Lemon Symphony
Proprietor of the Community plant variety right: Jørn Hansson
Decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office which is being contested: Failure to cancel the Community plant variety right for Lemon Symphony in accordance with Article 21 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 (1)
Appellant before the Board of Appeal: the Applicant
Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal
Pleas in law:
—Infringement of Article 59(2) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 (2) inasmuch as the applicant was not summoned to the hearing in due form;
—Infringement of Article 71(1), in conjunction with Articles 21, 67 and 68, of Regulation No 2100/94 inasmuch as the grounds of appeal were not considered or not adequately considered;
—Infringement of Article 73 of Regulation No 2100/94 and Article 230 EC inasmuch as the applicant's right to judicial review of administrative action has been infringed;
—Infringement of Article 48 of Regulation No 2100/94 inasmuch as a member of the Board of Appeal allegedly had an interest in the proceedings.
Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 of 27 July 1994 on Community plant variety rights (OJ 1994 L 227, p. 1).
Commission Regulation (EC) No 1239/95 of 31 May 1995 establishing implementing rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 as regards proceedings before the Community Plant Variety Office (OJ 1995 L 121, p. 37).