I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-239/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Belarus - Freezing of funds - Maintaining of the applicant’s name on the lists of persons, entities and bodies concerned - Error of assessment)
(2023/C 278/30)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Dana Astra IOOO (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by M. Lester, Barrister-at-Law, P. Sellar and J. Beck, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by S. Van Overmeire and T. Haas, acting as Agents)
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment
—of Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/353 of 25 February 2021 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus (OJ 2021 L 68, p. 189) and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/339 of 25 February 2021 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ 2021 L 68, p. 29),
—of Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/307 of 24 February 2022 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 97), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/300 of 24 February 2022 implementing Article 8a of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus (OJ 2022 L 46, p. 3),
in so far as those acts concern the applicant.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Dana Astra IOOO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.