EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-217/14: Action brought on 9 April 2014 — Gmina Kosakowo v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0217

62014TN0217

April 9, 2014
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

30.6.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/26

(Case T-217/14)

2014/C 202/33

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Gmina Kosakowo (Municipality of Kosakowo) (Kosakowo, Poland) (represented by: M. Leśny, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the decision taken by the European Commission on 11 February 2014 in Case SA. 35388 by which Poland was ordered to recover from the Gdynia-Kosakowo airport improperly paid State aid;

Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of its action the applicant puts forward three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law:

Mistaken determination of the factual situation taken as the basis on which the contested decision was adopted;

2.Second plea in law:

Breach of Article 107(1) TFEU through the unfounded assumption that the Municipality of Kosakowo had handed over public aid in a manner contrary to that provision in a situation in which the assumption of shares by that entity in the company Port Lotniczy Gdynia-Kosakowo sp. z o.o. constituted the settlement of a transaction relating to a contract for the lease of land; in addition, improper conduct by the European Commission of the private investor test;

3.Third plea in law:

Breach of the following procedural provisions: of Article 107(1) TFEU, in conjunction with Article 5(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, through the improper conduct of the private investor test; of Article 7(5), in conjunction with Article 13(1), of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 by reason of the mistaken determination of the amount of aid to be reimbursed, to which was also added expenditure for security and infrastructure; and also of the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU because of the lack of proper reasoning for the contested decision, which lacks elements essential to enable its grounds to be determined.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia