EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-524/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 21 December 2016 — European Commission v Hansestadt Lübeck, successor in law to Flughafen Lübeck GmbH (Appeal — State aid — Airport charges — Article 108(2) TFEU — Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU — Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Admissibility of an action for annulment — Person individually concerned — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Article 107(1) TFEU — Condition relating to selectivity)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CA0524

62014CA0524

December 21, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/3

(Case C-524/14 P) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017053EN.01000301-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017053EN.01000301-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>

((Appeal - State aid - Airport charges - Article 108(2) TFEU - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Decision to initiate the formal investigation procedure - Admissibility of an action for annulment - Person individually concerned - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Article 107(1) TFEU - Condition relating to selectivity))

(2017/C 053/03)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche, R. Sauer and V. Di Bucci, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings: Hansestadt Lübeck, successor in law to Flughafen Lübeck GmbH (represented by: M. Núñez Müller and I. Ruck, Rechtsanwälte)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and K. Petersen, Agents), Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M.A. Sampol Pucurull, Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the appeal;

2.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Hansestadt Lübeck;

3.Orders the Federal Republic of Germany and the Kingdom of Spain to bear their own costs.

(<a id="ntr1-C_2017053EN.01000301-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017053EN.01000301-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ 26, 26.1.2015.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia