- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-148/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Président du tribunal du travail de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 2 March 2022 — OP v Commune d’Ans
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022CN0148
62022CN0148
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.5.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 207/19
(Case C-148/22)
(2022/C 207/27)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: OP
Defendant: Commune d’Ans
Questions referred
1.Can Article 2(2)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (1) be interpreted as permitting a public administration to put in place an entirely neutral administrative environment and thus to prohibit all members of staff from wearing symbols of conviction, whether or not they are in direct contact with the public?
2.Can Article 2(2)(a) and (b) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation be interpreted as permitting a public administration to put in place an entirely neutral administrative environment and thus to prohibit all members of staff from wearing symbols of conviction, whether or not they are in direct contact with the public, even if that neutral prohibition appears mostly to affect women, and may thus constitute disguised discrimination on grounds of gender?
(1) OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.