- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-701/19 P: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 February 2021 — Pilatus Bank plc v European Central Bank (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Appeal manifestly unfounded — Economic and monetary policy — Prudential supervision of credit institutions — Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority — Appointment of a contact person — Conditional communication with the European Central Bank (ECB) — Withdrawal of licence prior to the commencement of proceedings — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility — Absence of a sufficiently clear and precise summary of the pleas in law relied on before the General Court — Failure to demonstrate a legal interest in bringing proceedings — Incorrect classification as a preparatory act — Substitution of grounds)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019CB0701
62019CB0701
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
10.5.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 182/22
(Case C-701/19 P) (1)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Appeal manifestly unfounded - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Suspension measures taken by the national supervisory authority - Appointment of a contact person - Conditional communication with the European Central Bank (ECB) - Withdrawal of licence prior to the commencement of proceedings - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility - Absence of a sufficiently clear and precise summary of the pleas in law relied on before the General Court - Failure to demonstrate a legal interest in bringing proceedings - Incorrect classification as a preparatory act - Substitution of grounds)
(2021/C 182/30)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Pilatus Bank plc (represented initially by O.H. Behrends and M. Kirchner, Rechtsanwälte, and subsequently by O.H. Behrends)
Other party to the proceedings: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Yoo, M. Anastasiou and A. Karpf, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the order
1.The appeal is dismissed.
2.Pilatus Bank plc is ordered to pay the costs.
(1)
OJ C 406, 2.12.2019.
* * *
Language of the case: English