- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-364/15: Action brought on 4 July 2015 — ADR Center v Commission
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0364
62015TN0364
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
14.9.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 302/63
(Case T-364/15)
(2015/C 302/78)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ADR Center Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Tantalo, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the Commission decision C (2015) 3117 final of 4 May 2015,
—alternatively, declare eligible all the costs found inadmissible by the Commission,
—order the defendants and any interveners to pay the applicant’s legal costs and expenses for this procedure in an amount to be determined equitably by the Court.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission lacks the competence to adopt a recovery order in contractual matters.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the decision relies on errors of fact and assessment.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission misused its power.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission breached their obligation to state reasons.