EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case F-103/09: Action brought on 22 December 2009 — Allen and Others v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009FN0103

62009FN0103

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

13.2.2010

Official Journal of the European Union

C 37/51

(Case F-103/09)

2010/C 37/80

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: John Allen (Oxford, United Kingdom) and Others (represented by: P. Lasok, I. Hutton, B. Lask, Barristers)

Defendant: European Commission

The subject matter and description of the proceedings

An application for damages and for the annulment of a decision refusing to pay damages in respect of the loss suffered by each applicant as a result of the fact that each of them was not recruited as a temporary servant of the Communities during the time when they worked at the JET Joint Undertaking.

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Tribunal should:

annul the Commission’s Decision dated 25 September 2009;

declare that the applicants had a right to, and should have been, treated as “other personnel” and/or recruited as such, in accordance with Article 8 of the original JET Statutes;

declare that the Commission discriminated against the applicants without objective justification during their engagement on the JET Project as regards their remuneration, pension rights and related benefits, and security of future employment;

order the Commission to compensate the applicants for the loss of earnings, pensions, and related benefits and privileges occasioned by the aforesaid breaches of Community law, including interest thereon as appropriate;

order the Commission to pay the costs of this appeal; and

take such further measures and grant such further relief, under the Statute of the Court of Justice and/or the Rules of procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal as may be necessary, just or equitable.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia