I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community figurative mark PROMAT – Earlier Community figurative mark PROMA – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94
Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 40/94, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see para. 52)
Re:
ACTION brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 May 2006 (Case R 1058/2005-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Puertas Proma SAL and Promat GmbH.
Applicant for the Community trade mark:
Community trade mark sought:
Word mark Promat relating to goods and services in Classes 1, 2, 6, 17, 19, 20 and 42 – Application No 803825
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings:
Puertas Proma, SAL
Mark or sign cited in opposition:
In particular, figurative mark PROMA designating goods and services in Classes 6, 20 and 39 – Application No 239384.
Decision of the Opposition Division:
Opposition upheld
Decision of the Board of Appeal:
Appeal dismissed
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Promat GmbH to pay the costs.