I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-247/12)(1)
((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark ARIS - Earlier Community figurative mark ARISA ASSURANCES S.A. - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Coexistence of earlier marks on the market - Principle of American law known as the ‘Morehouse defense’ - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
2014/C 202/25
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Argo Group International Holdings Ltd (Hamilton, Bermuda, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Hoy, S. Levine and N. Edbrooke, Solicitors)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Arisa Assurances SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: H. Bock, lawyer)
Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 March 2012 (Case R 193/2011-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Arisa Assurances SA and Argo Group International Holdings Ltd.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Argo Group International Holdings Ltd to pay the costs.
OJ C 243, 11.8.2012.