- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-3/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Najwyższy (Poland) lodged on 3 January 2014 — Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa SA v Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CN0003
62014CN0003
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.4.2014
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 102/13
(Case C-3/14)
2014/C 102/17
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa SA
Defendant: Prezes Urzędu Komunikacji Elektronicznej
Questions referred
1.Must Article 7(3) of Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services (Framework Directive), in conjunction with Article 28 of Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users’ rights relating to electronic communications networks and services (Universal Service Directive), be interpreted as meaning that every measure taken by a national regulatory authority in order to fulfil the obligation arising from Article 28 of Directive 2002/22 affects trade between Member States where that measure may ensure that end-users from other Member States are able to access non-geographic numbers within the territory of that Member State?
2.Must Article 7(3) in conjunction with Articles 6 and 20 of Directive 2002/21 be interpreted as meaning that, in resolving disputes between undertakings providing electronic communications networks or services concerning the fulfilment by one of those undertakings of the obligation arising from Article 28 of Directive 2002/22, a national regulatory authority cannot conduct consolidation proceedings even where the measure affects trade between Member States and national law requires the national regulatory authority to conduct consolidation proceedings in every case where a measure may affect that trade?
3.If the answer to Question 2 is in the affirmative, must Article 7(3) in conjunction with Articles 6 and 20 of Directive 2002/21, read in conjunction with Article 288 TFEU and Article 4(3) TEU, be interpreted as meaning that a national court is obliged to refrain from applying provisions of national law which require the national regulatory authority to conduct consolidation proceedings in every case where a measure taken by that authority may affect trade between Member States?
Language of the case: Polish
* * *