EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case C-637/13 P: Appeal brought on 4 December 2013 by Laufen Austria AG against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 16 September 2013 in Case T-411/10 Laufen Austria v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013CN0637

62013CN0637

December 4, 2013
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

22.2.2014

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/28

(Case C-637/13 P)

2014/C 52/51

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Appellant: Laufen Austria AG (represented by: E. Navarro Varona, abogada)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

uphold the arguments put forward by Laufen Austria AG in the present case;

set aside in part the judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 in Case T-411/10;

uphold Laufen Austria AG’s claims by reducing the fine imposed on it;

order the Commission to pay the costs incurred by Laufen Austria AG in the present case, as well as those incurred in Case T-411/10 in so far as the same grounds are concerned.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

1.First ground of appeal, alleging an erroneous application of Article 23(2) of Regulation No 1/2003 (1) and of the principles of proportionality and individual liability in relation to the fine imposed individually on Laufen Austria, AG for the infringement committed prior to its acquisition by Roca Sanitario, S.A.

2.Second ground of appeal, alleging error of law in the application of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and breach of the principles of equal treatment and proportionality, of the principle that reasons must be stated and of the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations in the application of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003. (2)

Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles [101 TFEU] and [102 TFEU] (OJ 2003 L 1, p.1).

OJ 2006 C 210, p. 2.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia